国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2025, Issue (9): 0-0
    
硬脊膜穿破硬膜外阻滞联合脉冲式自控输注镇痛应用于初产妇分娩镇痛的临床研究
于欢, 殷琴, 王金凤, 王云, 程伟1()
1.徐州医科大学
Effect of Dural Puncture Epidural Block combined with Fully Patient-controlled Epidural Bolus Analgesia for Labor Analgesia in primiparous women.
 全文:
摘要:

目的 对比硬脊膜穿破硬膜外阻滞(dural puncture epidural block, DPE)与硬膜外阻滞(epidural block, EP)联合脉冲式自控输注镇痛在分娩镇痛中的临床效果。方法 初产妇120例,随机分为EP组和DPE组。两组产妇的维持镇痛模式均为脉冲式自控输注镇痛,镇痛泵的药物配置比例为0.1%罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼0.5g/mL,首剂量和自控剂量均为10mL,不设置背景剂量,锁定时长为15min。主要研究指标为产妇分娩镇痛后10min(T1)时达到充分镇痛的比率,充分镇痛定义为疼痛视觉模拟评分量表(pain visual analogue scale, VAS)评分≤30mm。观测时间点设置为分娩镇痛前10min(T0)、镇痛后10min(T1)、镇痛后20min(T2)、镇痛后30min(T3)及宫口开全时(T4)。次要指标包括镇痛阻滞质量、自控硬膜外镇痛(patient-controlled epidural analgesia, PCEA)使用情况、不良反应及分娩结局。结果 DPE组在T1及T3时的充分镇痛率均高于EP组(均P<0.05),在T1、T3及T4时的疼痛VAS评分均低于EP组(均P<0.05)。DPE组产妇阻滞平面到达S2的速率、起效以及维持满意度NRS评分均高于EP组(均P<0.05),并且在药物消耗剂量、PCEA自控次数差异以及第二产程所需时长方面均低于EP组(均P<0.05)。两组产妇的不良反应发生率、镇痛前后催产素使用率、分娩方式、产后两小时出血量以及新生儿Apgar评分等差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。 结论 与EP相比,DPE在分娩镇痛起效速率和骶神经阻滞效果方面优势明显,可以提高分娩镇痛质量和满意度,减少镇痛药物使用剂量,并且未见明显不良反应。

关键词: 分娩镇痛;硬脊膜穿破硬膜外阻滞;脉冲式自控输注镇痛;骶神经阻滞
Abstract:

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of dural puncture epidural block (DPE) and epidural block (EP) combined with fully patient-controlled epidural bolus in labor analgesia. Methods A total of 120 primiparous women were enrolled and randomly divided into the EP group and DPE group. The maintenance analgesic mode for both groups was fully patient-controlled epidural bolus analgesia. The drug configuration ratio was 0.1% ropivacaine combined with sufentanil 0.5 μg/mL. The first dose of the pulsed analgesic pump was 10 mL, the self-controlled dose was 10 mL, the background dose was not set, and the locking time was 15 min. The primary outcome measure was the rate of adequate analgesia (pain visual analogue rating scale score≤30 mm) achieved 10 minutes (T1) after labor analgesia. The observation time points were set as 10 min before labor analgesia (T0), 10 min after analgesia (T1), 20 min after analgesia (T2), 30 min after analgesia (T3), and at the time of the cervix being fully dilated (T4). Secondary outcomes included analgesia block quality, patient-controlled epidural bolus analgesia (PCEA) pump use, adverse reactions, and delivery outcomes. Results The adequate analgesia rate of women in the DPE group at T1 and T3 was higher than that in the EP group (all P0.05), and the pain VAS scores at T1, T3, and T4 were lower than those in the EP group (all P0.05). The NRS scores of maternal satisfaction with the rate of reaching S2 at the block level, onset of response, and maintenance in the DPE group were higher than those in the EP group (all P0.05). Additionally, those in the DPE group were lower than those in the EP group (all P0.05) in terms of drug consumption dose, differences in the number of PCEA self-control times, and the duration of the second stage of labor. There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions, oxytocin use before and after analgesia, mode of delivery, two-hour postpartum blood loss, and neonatal Apgar score between the two groups (all P0.05). Conclusion Compared with EP, DPE has significant advantages in the onset rate of labor analgesia and sacral nerve block effect, which can improve the quality and satisfaction of labor analgesia, reduce the dosage of analgesics, and have no significant adverse effects.

Key words: Labor Analgesia; Dural Puncture Epidural Block; Patient-Controlled Epidural Bolus Analgesia; Sacral Nerve Block.