国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2025, Issue (6): 0-0
    
经皮耳迷走神经刺激对行蛛网膜下腔阻滞肛肠疾病手术患者术后快速康复的影响
龚海鹏, 张红星, 丁雪, 邹丽峰1()
1.邳州市人民医院
Clinical application of transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation in patients undergoing subarachnoid block anorectal surgery
 全文:
摘要:

摘 要: 目的: 探讨经皮耳迷走神经刺激对行蛛网膜下腔阻滞肛肠疾病手术患者术后快速康复的临床应用效果。方法: 选择医院于2022年4月至2024年3月期间收治的138例拟行蛛网膜下腔阻滞肛肠疾病手术患者随机分成观察组(69例)和对照组(69例)。对照组给予假刺激,观察组给予经皮耳迷走神经刺激。对比两组患者的首次排尿时间、首次排尿等待时间、首次排尿量、小腹胀满感评分、尿潴留发生率、因尿潴留导尿率、排尿通畅评分、麻醉平面消退时间、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、胃肠功能( I-FEED评分)、15项恢复质量量表(QoR-15)评分。结果: 观察组的首次排尿时间、首次排尿等待时间、小腹胀满感评分均低于对照组,首次排尿量高于对照组(P0.05)。观察组的尿潴留发生率、因尿潴留导尿率、排尿通畅评分、麻醉平面消退时间均低于对照组(P0.05)。观察组的术后1h VAS评分、术后12h VAS评分、术后24h VAS评分均低于对照组(P0.05)。观察组的术后24h I-FEED评分、术后48h I-FEED评分均低于对照组,观察组的术后24h QoR-15评分、术后48h QoR-15评分均高于对照(P0.05)。

关键词: 经皮耳迷走神经刺激;蛛网膜下腔阻滞;肛肠手术;尿潴留
Abstract:

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation on rapid recovery of patients undergoing subarachnoid block anorectal surgery. Methods: Patients with subarachnoid block for anorectal surgery, totaling 138 cases, admitted from April 2020 to March 2023 were randomly divided into an observation group (69 cases) and a control group (69 cases). The control group received sham stimulation, while the observation group received transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation. The first urination time, waiting time for the first urination, volume of the first urination, bloating sensation score, incidence of urinary retention, catheterization rate due to urinary retention, urination smoothness score, regression time of the anesthetic plane, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, gastrointestinal function (I-FEED score), and 15-item Quality of Recovery Scale (QoR-15) score were compared between the two groups. Results: After treatment, the first urination time, the first urination waiting time, and the bladder fullness score of the observation group were all lower than those of the control group, and the first urination volume was higher than that of the control group (P0.05). After treatment, the incidence of urinary retention, the rate of catheterization due to urinary retention, the urination smoothness score, and the regression time of the anesthetic plane in the observation group were all lower than those in the control group (P0.05). After treatment, the VAS scores at 1 hour, 12 hours, and 24 hours postoperatively in the observation group were all lower than those in the control group (P0.05). After treatment, the I-FEED scores at 24 hours and 48 hours postoperatively in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the QoR-15 scores at 24 hours and 48 hours postoperatively in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P0.05).

Key words: transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation; Subarachnoid block; Anorectal surgery; Urinary retention