国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2025, Issue (8): 0-0
    
吸入麻醉和静脉麻醉对成人手术患者术后谵妄的影响:一项Meta分析
崔郭宇, 赵志颖, 潘庆澳, 罗艳, 杨谦梓1()
1.上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院,上海交通大学医学院医学技术学院
The effects of inhalational anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia on postoperative delirium in adult patients : a meta-analysis
 全文:
摘要:

目的 使用 Meta分析比较全麻手术患者接受吸入麻醉和静脉麻醉后术后谵妄发生率是否存在差异。 方法 计算机检索Cochrane Library、Embase、OVID MEDLINE、Web of Science四个数据库从建库到2024年3月发表的文章,纳入比较以吸入麻醉作为术中麻醉维持方式和以静脉麻醉作为术中麻醉维持方式的患者术后谵妄发生率的随机对照试验。由3位研究人员进行文献的筛选和质量评价,用ReviewManager5.4以及R studio进行Meta分析和发表偏倚分析,使用随机效应模型计算相对危险度(relative risk,RR)。 结果 共纳入16篇文献,9470例患者,其中吸入麻醉组4729例,静脉麻醉组4741例。与静脉麻醉相比,接受吸入麻醉维持的患者术后谵妄发生率并没有显著差异(RR 0.99,95%CI 0.85~1.16,P=0.91),吸入麻醉组谵妄发生例数和总人数为363/4729,静脉麻醉组谵妄发生例数和总人数为376/4714。术后1天(RR 1.26, 95%CI 0.75~2.09,P=0.38)吸入麻醉组谵妄发生例数和总人数为133/3344,静脉麻醉组谵妄发生例数和总人数为104/3303、术后3天(RR 0.83,95%CI 0.61~1.13,P=0.23)吸入麻醉组谵妄发生例数和总人数为57/319,静脉麻醉组谵妄发生例数和总人数为79/353,和术后7天(RR 1.01,95%CI 0.75~1.36,P=0.94)吸入麻醉组谵妄发生例数和总人数为193/1262,静脉麻醉组谵妄发生例数和总人数为190/1282,这三个时间点的谵妄发生率在两组间也没有统计学差异。 结论 术中采用吸入麻醉维持和静脉麻醉麻醉对术后谵妄发生率没有明显影响。

关键词: 术后谵妄;吸入麻醉;静脉麻醉;Meta分析
Abstract:

Objective Using meta-analysis to compare the effects of inhalational anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia on the incidence of postoperative delirium. Methods The Cochrane Library, Embase, OVID MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles published from their establishment until March 2024. Randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of inhalational anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia on postoperative delirium incidence was included. Two researchers conducted literature screening and quality evaluation. ReviewManager 5.4 and R studio were used for meta-analysis and publication bias analysis. Results A total of 16 articles and 9470 patients were included, including 4729 cases in the inhalational anesthesia group and 4741 cases in the intravenous anesthesia group. There is no significant difference in the general risk of postoperative delirium between intravenous anesthesia and inhalational anesthesia (RR 0.99,95%CI 0.85~1.16,P=0.91),the number and total number of delirium cases in the inhalation anesthesia group were 363/4729, while the number and total number of delirium cases in the intravenous anesthesia group were 376/4714. Specifically, there is no statistical difference in the risk of postoperative delirium in 1 day (RR 1.26, 95%CI 0.75~2.09, P=0.38,133/3344 vs. 104/3303), 3 days (RR 0.83,95%CI 0.61~1.13,P=0.23, 57/319 vs. 79/353) or 7 days (RR 1.01,95%CI 0.75~1.36,P=0.94, 193/1262 vs. 190/1282) after surgery. Conclusions There is no difference of the incidence of postoperative delirium between patients receiving inhalational anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia during the surgeries.

Key words: Postoperative delirium; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Meta-analysis