国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2025, Issue (7): 0-0
    
三种神经阻滞术在前列腺癌放疗基准标志物置入中的应用比较和分析
王卉1()
1.陆军第81集团军医院
Comparison and analysis of the application of three nerve block surgeries in the implantation of fiducial marker for prostate cancer radiotherapy
 全文:
摘要:

目的 比较会阴神经阻滞(perineal nerve block,PNB)、前列腺周围神经阻滞(prostate perineural block,PPB)、椎管内麻醉(intrathecal anesthesia,IA)三种神经阻滞术在前列腺癌(prostate cancer,PCa)图像引导放疗黄金基准标志物(gold fiducial marker,GFM)置入中的应用价值,探讨最佳神经阻滞术中疼痛控制效果的影响因素。方法 筛选陆军第八十一集团军医院2018年6月至2023年6月接受PCa IGRT且置入了GFM的患者270例,收集其临床资料行前瞻性研究。采用抽签法随机将患者分为PNB组、PPB组、IA组,每组90例。评价和比较三组患者围手术期各项临床指标、疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue score,VAS)、不良事件(adverse event,AE)发生率。采用多因素logistic回归分析最佳神经阻滞分组GFM置入术中VAS影响因素。结果 神经阻滞5 min后,PNB组平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)最低(P<0.05),PPB组最高(P<0.05)。三组其他时间围手术其各项临床指标差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。PNB组GFM置入术中和术后6 h的VAS均最低(均P<0.05)。三组AE发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,最佳神经阻滞术PNB组中,GFM位置和会阴神经分支分别是影响疼痛控制效果的独立危险因素(均P<0.05)。GFM位于底部和会阴神经浅支阻滞时VAS≥4分的风险分别升高了2.389倍和1.592倍。结论 GFM置入神经阻滞术PNB的围手术期MAP最低且疼痛控制效果最好,具有一定的临床推广和普及意义。PNB前需规避危险因素,从而保证其应用安全性和临床价值。

关键词: 前列腺癌;图像引导放疗;黄金基准标志物;神经阻滞术;影响因素
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the application value of perineal nerve block (PNB), prostate peripheral nerve block (PPB), and intrathecal anesthesia (IA) in the implantation of the gold fiducial marker (GFM) in image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PCa), and to explore the factor affecting the optimal pain control effect during nerve block surgery. Methods: 270 patients who received PCa IGRT and had GFM implanted in the Hospital of the PLA 81st Group Army from June 2018 to June 2023 were selected. Their clinical data for this prospective study was collected. The patients were randomly divided into PNB group, PPB group, and IA group by using the lottery method, with 90 cases in each group. Various clinical indicators during the perioperative period, visual analog scale (VAS), and incidence of adverse events (AE) among three groups of the patients were evaluated and compared. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors affecting VAS during the GFM implantation surgery for the optimal nerve block group. Results: After 5 minutes of the nerve block, the PNB group had the lowest mean arterial pressure (MAP) (P0.05), while the PPB group had the highest (P0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in various clinical indicators among the three groups during the surgery at other times (all P0.05). The VAS scores of PNB group were the lowest during the GFM implantation surgery and 6 hours after the surgery (all P0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of AE among the three groups (P0.05). The result of multiple logistic regression analysis showed that, GFM location and perineal nerve branches were the independent risk factors affecting pain control effectiveness (all P0.05) for the optimal nerve block PNB group. The risk of VAS score ≥ 4 increased by 2.389 times and 1.592 times, respectively, when GFM was located at the bottom and superficial branch block of perineal nerve. Conclusion: GFM implantation nerve block PNB have the lowest perioperative MAP and the best pain control effect. PNB has certain clinical promotion and popularization significance. It is necessary to avoid the risk factors to ensure the application safety and clinical value before PNB.

Key words: prostate cancer; image guided radiotherapy; gold fiducial marker; nerve block; affecting factor