国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2024, Issue (11): 0-0
    
妊娠合并胎盘植入患者行剖宫产围术期麻醉多学科管理分析
王艳双, 车向明, 徐铭军1()
1.首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院
Analysis of multidisciplinary management of perioperative anesthesia in patients with pregnancy complicated with placenta implantation undergoing cesarean section
 全文:
摘要:

摘要 目的 探讨妊娠合并胎盘植入患者行剖宫产围术期的麻醉管理。方法 通过查询我院HIS系统2017.10-2022.04出院诊断为“剖宫产、胎盘植入或凶险性前置胎盘合并胎盘植入”的患者病例资料,共纳入92例患者。根据植入程度不同分为粘连型(A组)19例、植入型(B组)43例、穿透型(C组)30例三组,记录并分析患者的一般情况、孕产次、麻醉方式、术中出血量、手术时长、住院时间、ICU入住率、输血情况、术前腹主动脉球囊和/或输尿管支架放置与否?产妇是否切子宫、新生儿Apgar评分等。 结果 与A组比较,C组孕周明显低于A组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);C组的椎管内麻醉比例(73.33%)明显低于A、B两组,全身麻醉比例(6.67%)高于A、B两组(P <0.01)。三组患者术中出血量、术中输入红细胞、血浆、自体血回输C组均显著高于A组和B组(P<0.01);C组患者住院时间、手术时间均显著长于A组和B组(P<0.01);C组新生儿体重明显低于A组(P<0.01);与A组比较,C组术前放置腹主动脉球囊比例(80%)和输尿管支架的比例(56.67%)均显著高于A组和B组(P均<0.01).结论 随着胎盘植入程度加重,椎管内麻醉占比有所下降,全身麻醉比例有所上升,但良好的腰硬联合硬膜外麻醉仍占主导地位,本研究中胎盘植入目前仍以椎管内麻醉为主,产科自体血回输减少了异体血的输入量,本研究证实安全有效,术前放置腹主动脉球囊的患者术中出血量减少,子宫切除率明显下降,完善的术前准备、积极的多学科会诊、严密的术中监测、合理的围术期麻醉管理是保障患者安全的重要支撑。

关键词: 妊娠; 胎盘植入; 剖宫产 ;围术期; 麻醉
Abstract:

[Abstract] Objective:To explore the experience of anesthesia management in perioperative period of cesarean section in patients with pregnancy complicated with placenta implantation.Methods:By querying the HIS system of our hospital from October 2017 to April 2022,the patient 's case data diagnosed as ' cesarean section and placenta implantation ' were discharged.According to the degree of implantation, they were divided into three groups : 19 cases of adhesive type(group A), 43 cases of implanted type(group B)and 30 cases of penetrating type(group C).Record and analyze the patient 's general condition.Timesr of pregnancies and deliveries、anesthesia、Intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, ICU occupancy rate, blood transfusion, preoperative abdominal aortic balloon, ureteral stent placement or not, maternal hysterectomy, neonatal general condition, Aprgar score, etc.Results Compared with group A, the gestational age of group C was significantly lower than that of group A, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The proportion of spinal anesthesia in group C ( 73.33 % ) was significantly lower than that in group A and B, and the proportion of general anesthesia ( 6.67% ) was higher than that in the two groups ( P 0.01 ).The intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative input of red blood cells, plasma and autologous blood in group C were significantly higher than those in group A and group B (P 0.01 ). The hospitalization time and operation time in group C were significantly longer than those in group A and group B ( P 0.01 ). The neonatal weight in group C was significantly lower than that in group A (P 0.01 ).Compared with group A, the proportion of preoperative abdominal aortic balloon placement ( 80% ) and ureteral stent placement ( 56.67 % ) in group C were significantly higher than those in group A and group B ( both P 0.01 ).Conclusions:With the aggravation of placental implantation, the proportion of intraspinal anesthesia decreased, and the proportion of general anesthesia increased, but good combined spinal epidural anesthesia still dominated. In this study, placental implantation is still dominated by intraspinal anesthesia.Obstetrical autologous blood transfusion reduces the amount of allogeneic blood input. This study confirms that it is safe and effective.The intraoperative blood loss was reduced and the hysterectomy rate was significantly decreased in patients with preoperative abdominal aortic balloon placement.Perfect preoperative preparation, active multidisciplinary consultation, strict intraoperative monitoring, and reasonable perioperative anesthesia management are important supports for ensuring patient safety.

Key words: pregnancy ; placental implantation ; cesarean section ; perioperative;anesthesia