国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2024, Issue (9): 0-0
    
超声评估反比通气对胸科术后膈肌功能的影响
王娴雅, 何林丹, 丰嘉露, 张邓新1()
1.徐州医科大学
Ultrasound evaluation of the effect of inverse ratio ventilation on diaphragmatic function after thoracic surgery
 全文:
摘要:

目的 应用M型超声评价反比通气对胸科肺部手术术后膈肌功能的影响。 方法 选择择期行单侧单个肺叶切除术的患者86例,年龄18~65岁,18.5 kg/㎡<体重指数(BMI)<30.0 kg/㎡,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级Ⅰ、Ⅱ级,采用随机数字表法将患者分为常规通气组(C组)、反比通气组(F组),每组43例。支气管插管全身麻醉后,双肺通气时潮气量(VT) 6~8 ml/kg,呼吸频率(RR) 12~15次/min,吸入氧浓度50%,吸入氧流量1 L/min;单肺通气时F组吸呼比(I∶E)=2∶1,VT 6 ml/kg,呼气末正压(PEEP) 5 cmH2O(1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa),C组I∶E=1∶2,两组患者其他呼吸参数一致。记录患者一般资料(年龄、性别比、BMI、ASA分级、高血压、糖尿病)。记录麻醉前(T0)、单肺通气后5 min(T1)、单肺通气后1 h(T2)、术毕即刻(T3)患者心率、平均动脉压(MAP)、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2);记录T1、T2、T3时的气道峰压(Ppeak)、气道平台压(Pplat)、平均气道压(Pmean)和PEEP;应用M型超声采集T0和拔管后即刻(T4)的双侧膈肌移动度(DE)及膈肌浅快呼吸指数(D‑RSBI),记录住院时间、膈肌功能障碍及术后5 d肺部并发症发生情况,并对膈肌功能障碍与术后5 d肺部并发症发生情况进行Spearman相关性分析;记录手术时间、单肺通气时间、气管拔管时间;术毕拔管后记录警觉/镇静观察评分。 结果 与C组比较:F组T4时术侧及非术侧DE较高、D‑RSBI较低(均P<0.05);DE差值、D‑RSBI差值较低(均P<0.05);T1、T2时PaO2较高(均P<0.05);T1、T2、T3时Ppeak、Pplat较低(均P<0.05),PEEP、Pmean较高(均P<0.05)。与T0时比较,两组患者T4时术侧及非术侧DE降低、D‑RSBI升高(均P<0.05)。与术侧比较,两组患者T4时非术侧DE较高、D‑RSBI较低(均P<0.05),DE差值、D‑RSBI差值较低(均P<0.05)。Spearman相关性分析显示,膈肌功能障碍发生情况与术后5 d肺部并发症发生情况呈正相关(r=0.65,P<0.05)。其余指标差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。 结论 反比通气可改善膈肌功能,降低膈肌功能障碍的发生率。膈肌功能障碍是术后肺部并发症的一个关键因素。

关键词: 膈肌; 超声; 术后肺部并发症; 膈肌功能障碍; 反比通气
Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the effect of inverse ratio ventilation on diaphragmatic function after thoracic lung surgery through M‑mode ultrasound. Methods A total of 86 patients, aged 18‒65 years, with body mass index (BMI) of 18.5 kg/m2 to 30.0 kg/m2, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification grades Ⅰ or Ⅱ, who were scheduled for unilateral single‑lung lobectomy, were selected. According to the random number table method, they were divided into two groups (n=43): a conventional ventilation group (group C) and an inverse ratio ventilation group (group F). After endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia, the tidal volume (VT) was set at 6‒8 ml/kg, respiratory rate (RR) at 12‒15 times/min, oxygen concentration at 50%, and oxygen flow at 1 L/min during double‑lung ventilation. For single‑lung ventilation, group F showed an inspiration‑to‑expiration ratio (I∶E) of 2∶1, with a VT of 6 ml/kg, and positive end‑expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O (1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa), while group C had an I∶E ratio of 1∶2. Other respiratory parameters were the same between the two groups. Then, record patient demographics (age, gender ratio, BMI, ASA classification, hypertension, diabetes) and the heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) were recorded before anesthesia (T0), 5 min after single‑lung ventilation (T1), 1 h after single‑lung ventilation (T2), and immediately after surgery (T3). The airway peak pressure (Ppeak), plateau airway pressure (Pplat), mean airway pressure (Pmean), and PEEP were recorded at T1, T2, and T3. The M‑mode ultrasound was used to collect bilateral diaphragmatic excursion (DE) and diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index (D‑RSBI) at T0 and immediately after extubation (T4). Hospital stay duration, the incidence of diaphragmatic dysfunction and pulmonary complications within postoperative 5 d was recorded, and Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between the incidence of diaphragmatic dysfunction and pulmonary complications within postoperative 5 d. Surgical duration, single‑lung ventilation time, and extubation time were recorded, as well as Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation post‑extubation Results Compared with group C, group F showed increased DE and decreased D‑RSBI at T4 on both the operative and non‑operative sides (all P<0.05), reduction in DE differences and D‑RSBI differences (all P<0.05); increases in PaO2 at T1 and T2 (all P<0.05); reduction in Ppeak and Pplat at T1, T2, and T3 (all P<0.05), and increases PEEP and Pmean (all P<0.05). Compared with those at T0, both groups presented decreased DE and increased D‑RSBI at T4 on both the operative and non‑operative sides (all P<0.05). Compared with those at the operative side, both groups showed increased DE and decreased D‑RSBI at T4 on the non‑operative side (all P<0.05), and reduction in DE differences and D‑RSBI differences (all P<0.05). Spearman correlation analysis indicated that the incidence of diaphragmatic dysfunction was positively correlated with the incidence of pulmonary complications within postoperative 5 d (r=0.65, P<0.05). There were no statistical differences in other indicators (all P>0.05). Conclusions Inverse ratio ventilation can improve diaphragmatic function and reduce the incidence of diaphragmatic dysfunction. Diaphragmatic dysfunction is a key factor in postoperative pulmonary complications.

Key words: Diaphragm; Ultrasound; Postoperative pulmonary complication; Diaphragmatic dysfunction; Inverse ratio ventilation