国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2025, Issue (1): 0-0
    
右美托咪定联合艾司氯胺酮对小儿眼科全麻手术快速康复的影响
张雷光, 张振巍, 余畅月, 李慧娟, 岳修勤1()
1.新乡医学院第一附属医院
Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with esketamine on enhanced recovery after pediatric ophthalmology surgery under general anesthesia
 全文:
摘要:

目的 观察右美托咪定(Dex)联合艾司氯胺酮对小儿眼科全麻手术快速康复的影响。 方法 2022年4月—2023年8月于开封市中心医院行眼科全麻手术的患儿150例,按随机数字表法分为3组:对照组(M组,48例)、观察1组(S组,53例)、观察2组(Y组,49例)。M组行传统全麻诱导,S组给予艾司氯胺酮诱导麻醉,Y组给予Dex复合艾司氯胺酮诱导麻醉。记录3组患儿一般资料,入麻醉准备间时(T0)、手术开始即刻(T1)、手术开始5 min(T2),手术开始10 min(T3)、手术结束时(T4)的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率、呼吸频率(RR),术日清晨7点及麻醉诱导完成后的左、右眼内压;记录3组患儿喉罩拔除时间、苏醒时间、认知功能恢复时间、定向力恢复时间、住院时间。 结果 3组患儿一般资料差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。与T0时比较,M组患儿T1~T4时MAP、心率降低,S组患儿T1~T4时MAP、心率升高、RR降低(均P<0.05),Y组患儿T1~T4时RR降低(均P<0.05);与M组比较,S组、Y组患儿T1~T4时MAP、心率较高(均P<0.05);与S比较,Y组患儿T1~T4时MAP、心率较低(均P<0.05)。与术日清晨7点比较,麻醉诱导完成后M组患儿的左、右眼内压降低(均P<0.05),S组和Y组患儿的左、右眼内压升高(均P<0.05);与M组比较,S组和Y组患儿麻醉诱导完成后的左、右眼压较高;与S组比较,Y组患儿麻醉诱导完成后的左、右眼压较低(均P<0.05)。与M组比较,S组患儿苏醒时间、认知功能恢复时间较长,喉罩拔除时间、定向力恢复时间、住院时间较短(均P<0.05),Y组患儿喉罩拔除时间、苏醒时间、认知功能恢复时间、定向力恢复时间、住院时间均较短(均P<0.05);与S组比较,Y组患儿喉罩拔除时间、苏醒时间、认知功能恢复时间、定向力恢复时间、住院时间均较短(均P<0.05)。其余指标差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。 结论 Dex联合艾司氯胺酮在小儿眼科全麻手术中的麻醉效果良好,可安全、有效地应用于小儿眼科全麻手术,促进快速康复。

关键词: 小儿; 眼科手术学; 右美托咪定; 艾司氯胺酮; 血流动力学; 快速康复
Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine (Dex) combined with esketamine on enhanced recovery after pediatric ophthalmology surgery under general anesthesia. Methods A total of 150 children who underwent pediatric ophthalmology surgery under general anesthesia at the Central Hospital of Kaifeng from April 2022 to August 2023 were selected. According to the random number table method, they were divided into three groups: a control group (group M, n=48), an observation group 1 (group S, n=53), and an observation group 2 (group Y, n=49). For anesthesia induction, group M followed traditional method, group S was administered with esketamine, while group Y received a combination of Dex and esketamine. Then, their general information was recorded, and mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, and respiratory rate (RR) were recorded upon entering the anesthesia preparation room (T0), immediately at the start of surgery (T1), 5 min after the start of surgery (T2), 10 min after the start of surgery (T3), and at the end of surgery (T4). Furthermore, intraocular pressure was measured in the left and right eyes at 7 AM on the day of surgery and after the completion of anesthesia induction. The time to laryngeal mask removal, time to emergence, time to recovery of cognitive function, time to recovery of orientation, and the length of hospitalization stay were recorded. Results There were no statistical differences in general information among the three groups (all P>0.05). Compared with those at T0, group M showed decreases in MAP and heart rate at T1 to T4, group S presented increases in MAP and heart rate, and decreases in RR at T1 to T4 (all P<0.05), while in group Y, RR decreased at T1 to T4. Compared with group M, MAP and heart rate were reduced in groups S and Y at T1 to T4 (all P<0.05). Compared with group S, MAP and heart rate were reduced in group Y at T1 to T4 (P<0.05). Compared with those at 7 AM on the day of surgery, intraocular pressure in the left and right eyes of group M decreased after anesthesia induction (all P<0.05), while intraocular pressure increased in groups S and Y after anesthesia induction (all P<0.05). Compared with group M, intraocular pressure in groups S and Y increased after anesthesia induction, while group Y had lower intraocular pressure than group S after anesthesia induction (all P<0.05). Compared with group M, group S presented decreases in time to emergence, and time to recovery of cognitive function, time to laryngeal mask removal, time to orientation recovery and the length of hospitalization stay (all P<0.05); group Y showed decreases in time to emergence, and time to recovery of cognitive function, time to laryngeal mask removal, time to orientation recovery and the length of hospitalization stay (all P<0.05). Compared with group S, group Y showed reduced time to laryngeal mask removal, time to emergence, time to recovery of cognitive function, time to recovery of orientation, and decreased length of hospitalization stay (all P<0.05); while group Y had shorter times for laryngeal mask removal, recovery, cognitive function recovery, orientation recovery, and hospital stay (all P<0.05). There were no statistical differences in other indexes (all P>0.05). Conclusions The combination of Dex and esketamine exhibits good anesthetic effect in child patients after pediatric ophthalmology surgery under general anesthesia and can be safely and effectively used to promote rapid recovery.

Key words: Children; Ophthalmic surgery; Dexmedetomidine; Esketamine; Hemodynamics; Rapid rehabilitation