国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2024, Issue (10): 0-0
    
收肌管阻滞联合腘丛神经阻滞在关节镜下 前交叉韧带重建术后镇痛的应用
王文松, 李媛, 孙潞, 崔晓光1()
1.海南医学院第一附属医院
Application of adductor canal block combined with popliteal plexus block in analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction under arthroscopy
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探讨超声引导下收肌管阻滞(ACB)联合腘丛神经阻滞(PPB)在膝关节镜下前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)术后镇痛中应用的可行性。 方法 选取2023年3月至2024年3月在海南医学院第一附属医院拟全麻下行膝关节镜单侧ACLR患者58例,年龄18~60岁,按随机数字表法分为收肌管阻滞组(A组,28例)和收肌管联合腘丛神经阻滞组(AP组,30例)。A组患者在超声引导下以0.25%罗哌卡因+1 μg/kg右美托咪定(共15 ml)行ACB;AP组患者在A组的基础上,以0.25%罗哌卡因+1 μg/kg右美托咪定(共10 ml)行PPB。之后两组患者均行喉罩全麻。记录患者术后苏醒时(T0)、术后6 h(T1)、术后12 h(T2)、术后18 h(T3)、术后24 h(T4)、术后36 h(T5)、术后48 h(T6)、术后72 h(T7)时的静息和运动视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛评分、患肢足运动功能评分、股四头肌肌力分级,患肢足运动功能和股四头肌肌力减弱例数;记录首次补救镇痛时间,术后双氯芬酸钠用量,补救镇痛率和小腿内侧感觉恢复正常时间;记录阻滞前、阻滞10 min后、手术开始时、手术结束时、术后6 h、术后12 h时的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率;记录术中低血压、心动过缓,术后并发症(恶心呕吐、院内跌倒)及神经阻滞相关并发症(神经损伤、穿刺部位血肿、感染)等不良反应发生情况。 结果 与A组比较,AP组T0、T1、T2、T5时静息和运动VAS疼痛评分较低(均P<0.05),T3、T4、T6、T7时静息和运动VAS疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05),术后首次补救镇痛时间较长,术后双氯芬酸钠用量较少,补救镇痛率较低(均P<0.05)。两组患者各时点股四头肌肌力分级、患肢足运动功能评分、股四头肌肌力减弱例数、患肢足运动功能减弱例数、小腿内侧感觉恢复正常时间差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。AP组阻滞10 min后的MAP、心率低于A组(均P<0.05),两组患者阻滞前、手术开始时、手术结束时、术后6 h、术后12 h的MAP、心率差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。两组患者不良反应发生情况差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。 结论 超声引导下ACB+PPB可有效缓解ACLR术后疼痛,且对股四头肌及踝关节运动影响很小,有利于患者早期功能锻炼和康复训练,减少术后镇痛药的使用。

关键词: 收肌管阻滞; 腘丛神经阻滞; 前交叉韧带重建术; 术后镇痛
Abstract:

Objective To explore the feasibility of ultrasound‑guided adductor canal block (ACB) combined with popliteal plexus block (PPB) in analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) under knee arthroscopy. Methods A total of 58 patients, aged 18‒60 years, scheduled for unilateral ACLR under general anesthesia at the First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University from March 2023 to March 2024, were selected, According to the random number table method, they were divided into two groups: an adductor canal block group (group A, n=28) and an adductor canal block combined with popliteal plexus block group (group AP, n=30). In group A, patients received ACB under ultrasound guidance with 0.25% ropivacaine+1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine (15 ml in total). In group AP, patients received underwent PPB with 0.25% ropivacaine+1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine (10 ml in total for PPB), in addition to the same treatment in group A. All the patients were subsequently subject to general anesthesia via laryngeal mask airway. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest and during movement, limb motor function, quadriceps muscle strength grading at the time of postoperative recovery (T0), 6 h (T1), 12 h (T2), 18 h (T3), 24 h (T4), 36 h (T5), 48 h (T6), and 72 h (T7), and the number of weakened cases of limb motor function and quadriceps muscle strength grading were recorded; additional parameters recorded, time to first rescue analgesia, use of diclofenac sodium postoperatively, rate of rescue analgesia, and time to sensory recovery of the medial calf; mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate were recorded at 10 min after block, at surgery start, surgery end, and at postoperative 6 h and 12 h; the incidences of hypotension, bradycardia, and postoperative complications (nausea, vomiting, and falls) as well as nerve block‑related complications (nerve injury, hematoma, and infection) were also noted. Results Compared with group A, group AP showed significant decreases in VAS scores at rest and during at T0, T1, T2, and T5 (all P<0.05), while differences at T3, T4, T6, T7 were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Group AP had a longer time to first rescue analgesia, less diclofenac sodium use postoperatively, and a lower rate of rescue analgesia (all P<0.05). There were no statistical differences between the two groups in quadriceps strength grading, limb motor function scores, cases of weakened quadriceps strength, or time to sensory recovery of the medial calf (all P>0.05). At post‑block 10 min, MAP and heart rate in group AP were lower than those in group A (all P<0.05), but no significant differences were observed before the block, at the start or end of surgery, or at postoperative 6 h and 12 h (all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions Ultrasound‑guided ACB combined with PPB can effectively alleviate postoperative pain following ACLR, with little impact on quadriceps and ankle joint function, facilitating early functional exercise and rehabilitation while reducing the need for postoperative analgesics.

Key words: Adductor canal block; Popliteal plexus block; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Postoperative analgesia