国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2024, Issue (9): 0-0
    
不同术后镇痛方式对食管癌患者术后镇痛效果及细胞因子的影响
马玉, 刘育贤, 李彭依, 刘辉, 卞清明1()
1.南京医科大学附属肿瘤医院
Evaluation of the effects of different postoperative analgesic modalities on postoperative analgesia in patients with esophageal cancer and their effects on cytokines
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探讨患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)与患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)对食管癌根治术患者术后镇痛效果及细胞因子水平的影响。 方法 择期行食管癌根治术的患者36例,采用随机数字表法按3∶2分为PCEA组(21例)与PCIA组(15例)。两组其他麻醉相同基础上,PCEA组术后采用罗哌卡因(0.15%)联合芬太尼(2 mg/L)的PCEA方案,PCIA组术后采用芬太尼(12 μg/kg)的PCIA方案。记录两组患者一般资料,术后2、4、8、16、24、36、48 h静息及运动数字分级评分法(NRS)评分,术后不良反应发生情况,术前、手术结束、术后24 h、术后48 h血清白细胞介素(IL)‑1β、IL‑6、IL‑10、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)‑α水平。 结果 两组患者一般资料差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。PCEA组患者术后4、8、16、24、36 h静息及运动NRS评分低于PCIA组(均P<0.05),两组患者术后2、48 h时静息及运动NRS评分差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。两组患者不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。PCEA组患者术后48 h血清IL‑6水平低于PCIA组(P<0.05),PCEA组患者术后48 h血清IL‑1β、IL‑6、IL‑10水平均低于术后24 h时(均P<0.05)。两组患者其余指标差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。 结论 食管癌根治术患者术后采用PCEA较PCIA能提供更好的术后镇痛效果,降低患者术后48 h血清IL‑6水平。

关键词: 硬膜外镇痛; 患者自控镇痛; 食管切除术; 细胞因子
Abstract:

Objective To explore the effects of patient‑controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and patient‑controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) on postoperative analgesia and cytokine levels in serum on patients undergoing resection of esophageal carcinoma. Methods Thirty⁃six patients scheduled for elective resection of esophageal carcinoma were assigned to PECA group (21 cases) or PCIA group (15cases) according to the random number table method in a 3:2 ratio. Based on the same other anesthetics in the two groups, the patients in the PCEA group received combined use of ropivacaine (0.15%) and fentanyl (2 mg/L) for PCEA, while the patients in the PCIA group used fentanyl (12 μg/kg) for PCIA as an analgesic regimen. The general information of patients in both groups, postoperative Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores at 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 36 h and 48 h for rest and movement, and the occurrence of postoperative adverse events were recorded. The serum levels of interleukin (IL)⁃1β, IL⁃6, IL⁃10, and tumor necrosis factor⁃α (TNF⁃α) at preoperative, end of the surgery, 24 h and 48 h after the surgery were measured in both groups. Results There were no statistically significant differences in general patient information between the two groups (all P>0.05). The NRS scores at rest and during movement in the PCEA group were lower than those in the PCIA group at 4, 8, 16, 24 h and 36 h after surgery (all P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in NRS scores at rest and during movement between the two groups at 2 h and 48 h after surgery (all P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups (all P>0.05). Serum IL‑6 levels in the PCEA group were lower than those in the PCIA group at 48 h postoperatively (P<0.05). In addition, the serum levels of IL⁃1β, IL⁃6, and IL⁃10 in the PCEA group at 48 h after surgery were lower than the levels at 24 h after surgery (all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for the remaining indicators (all P>0.05). Conclusions Epidural analgesia was superior to intravenous analgesia for patient‑controlled postoperative pain relief after esophagectomy and reduced serum IL‑6 levels at 48 h after surgery.

Key words: Epidural analgesia; Patient controlled analgesia; Esophagectomy; Cytokines