国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2025, Issue (3): 0-0
    
高海拔地区脉压变异度联合控制性低中心静脉压监测在肝包虫切除术中的应用
张培福, 王学军, 高世龙, 熊成龙1()
1.青海红十字医院
Application of pulse pressure variability in high altitude combined with controlled low central venous pressure monitoring in liver hydatidification resection
 全文:
摘要:

摘要 目的:探讨高海拔地区脉压变异度联合低中心静脉压监测在肝包虫切除术中应用。方法:选取2020年4月-2024年2月在我院择期行肝包虫切除术患者50例来进行研究,观察组(脉压变异度联合中心静脉压监测组)25 例,对照组(常规麻醉组)25 例。比较两组患者术中出血量、肝门阻断时间、肝包虫切除时间,术前、术后的动脉血气指标及两组术前和术后1d的肝肾功能指标。结果:两组患者比较,观察组术中出血量明显少于对照组,观察组患者肝门阻断时间、切除肝包虫时间均明显缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后两组患者乳酸值水平均升高,血红蛋白、红细胞压积指标水平均下降(P0.05),与对照组比较,观察组患者乳酸值、血红蛋白、红细胞压积指标有明显差异(P0.05)。两组患者的肝功能、肾功能指标与术前相比,术后1d谷丙转氨酶( ALT) 水平均明显增高(P<0.05),但是观察组增高幅度明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。术后1d 两组患者总胆红素( TBIL) 、血尿素氮( BUN) 、血肌酐( Scr) 水平比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:脉压变异度联合低中心静脉压监测能显著减少肝包虫切除术术中出血量,减少肝门阻断时间,缩短切除肝包虫时间,且对术后肝肾功能无明显影响,可安全的在临床中应用。

关键词: 关键词:高海拔地区;脉压变异度;低中心静脉压;肝包虫切除术
Abstract:

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the application of pulse pressure variability combined with low central venous pressure monitoring in hepatic hydatidiectomy. Methods: 50 patients undergoing elective liver hydatidid resection in our hospital from April 2020 to February 2024 were selected for study, 25 patients in observation group (pulse pressure variability combined with central venous pressure monitoring group) and 25 patients in control group (conventional anesthesia group). Compared the intraoperative blood loss, hilar block time, hepatic hydatid resection time, preoperative and postoperative arterial blood gas indexes and liver and kidney function indexes before and after 1d in the two groups. Results: Compared with the two groups, the observation group was significantly less than the control group, and the liver portal blocking time and hydatid resection time in the observation group were significantly shortened, statistically different (P 0.05); the lactate levels in the two groups were increased, and the hemoglobin and hematocrit levels decreased (P 0.05), and the lactate, hemoglobin and hematocrit levels in the observation group were significantly different (P 0.05). The liver function and renal function indexes of both groups were significantly higher than the postoperative glutamate transaminase (ALT) level (P 0.05), but the increase in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P 0.05). There was no statistical difference in total bilirubin (TBIL), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and blood creatinine (Scr) at 1d (P 0.05). Conclusion: Pulse pressure variation combined with low central venous pressure monitoring can significantly reduce the amount of intraoperative blood loss, reduce the time of hepatic portal block, shorten the time of hepatic hydatid resection, and have no obvious impact on postoperative liver and kidney function, which can be safely used in clinical practice.

Key words: KEY WORDS High altitude; Pulse pressure variability; Low central venous pressure; Hepatic hydatidiectomy