国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2024, Issue (9): 0-0
    
普瑞巴林联合氨酚曲马多对肺结节穿刺定位术患者急性疼痛的影响
王清峰, 刘泓妍, 张丽, 刘郁鋆, 徐祗彪, 赵林林1()
1.徐州医科大学麻醉学院
Effect of pregabalin combined with tramadol/acetaminophen on acute pain in patients undergoing CT‑guided puncture localization of pulmonary nodules
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探讨普瑞巴林和氨酚曲马多对CT引导下肺结节穿刺定位术患者急性疼痛的影响。 方法 采用2×2析因试验设计,选取120例择期行CT引导下肺结节穿刺定位术的患者,采用随机数字表法将患者随机分为4组:对照组(C组,30例)、普瑞巴林复合安慰剂组(PC组,29例)、氨酚曲马多复合安慰剂组(AC组,30例)、普瑞巴林复合氨酚曲马多组(PA组,29例)。各组均于定位前1 h口服相应药物。分析普瑞巴林与氨酚曲马多之间是否存在交互作用(若存在交互作用,则分析普瑞巴林和氨酚曲马多各自的单独效应;若不存在交互作用,则分析普瑞巴林和氨酚曲马多各自的主效应)。若分析普瑞巴林的主效应,患者则分为普瑞巴林组(58例)与非普瑞巴林组(60例);若分析氨酚曲马多的主效应,患者则分为氨酚曲马多组(59例)与非氨酚曲马多组(59例)。记录患者一般资料和穿刺定位相关资料。采用数字分级评分法(Numerical Rating Scale, NRS)评估所有患者的疼痛评分,记录定位后即刻收缩压、即刻舒张压、即刻心率、即刻脉搏血氧饱和度,记录中重度疼痛发生率、镇痛补救比例、药物不良反应发生率、患者满意度(非常满意、满意、一般、不满意、非常不满意)、定位前后收缩压差值、定位前后舒张压差值和定位前后心率差值。 结果 患者一般资料和穿刺定位相关资料差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。普瑞巴林与氨酚曲马多的主效应均显著(P<0.05),但两者交互作用不显著(P=0.752)。与非普瑞巴林组比较,普瑞巴林组患者NRS评分、定位后即刻收缩压、定位后即刻舒张压、定位后即刻心率、中重度疼痛发生率、镇痛补救比例均较低(均P<0.05),定位后即刻脉搏血氧饱和度及非常满意的人数均较高(均P<0.05),而药物不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与非氨酚曲马多组比较,氨酚曲马多组患者NRS评分、定位后即刻收缩压、定位后即刻舒张压、定位后即刻心率、中重度疼痛发生率、镇痛补救比例均较低(均P<0.05),定位后即刻脉搏血氧饱和度及非常满意的人数均较高(均P<0.05),而药物不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与C组、PC组和AC组比较,PA组患者NRS评分、定位前后收缩压差值、定位前后舒张压差值和定位前后心率差值均较低(均P<0.05);与C组比较,PC组和AC组患者NRS评分、定位前后收缩压差值、定位前后舒张压差值和定位前后心率差值均较低(均P<0.05);但PC组和AC组患者之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与C组比较,PA组患者定位后即刻收缩压、定位后即刻舒张压、定位后即刻心率、中重度疼痛发生率、镇痛补救比例均较低,而定位后即刻脉搏血氧饱和度以及非常满意的人数均较高(均P<0.05)。与C组比较,AC组患者中重度疼痛发生率较低(P<0.05),而非常满意的人数较高(P<0.05)。C组、PC组、AC组、PA组患者药物不良反应发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。 结论 普瑞巴林及氨酚曲马多联合用药或单一用药均能显著降低患者肺结节穿刺定位后的疼痛评分,但二者联合用药镇痛效果最佳,显著降低了穿刺定位后的血流动力学波动,且药物不良反应发生率低。

关键词: 肺结节; 穿刺定位; 急性疼痛; 普瑞巴林; 氨酚曲马多
Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effect of pregabalin combined with tramadol/acetaminophen on acute pain in patients undergoing CT‑guided puncture localization of pulmonary nodules. Methods A 2×2 factorial trial design was used, and 120 patients scheduled for CT‑guided puncture localization of pulmonary nodules were selected. According to the random number table method, the patients were divided into four groups: a control group (group C, n=30), a pregabalin plus placebo group (group PC, n=29), a tramadol/acetaminophen plus placebo group (group AC, n=30), and a pregabalin plus tramadol/acetaminophen group (group PA, n=29). Each group received the corresponding oral medication 1 h before localization. Whether there was an interaction between pregabalin and tramadol/acetaminophen would be analyzed (If there was an interaction, the individual effects of pregabalin and tramadol/acetaminophen would be analyzed. If there was no interaction, the primary effects of pregabalin and tramadol/acetaminophen would be analyzed). For analysis of the primary effect of pregabalin, the patients were divided into a pregabalin group (n=58) and a non‑pregabalin group (n=60). For analysis of the primary effect of tramadol/acetaminophen, the patients were divided into a tramadol/acetaminophen group (n=59) and a non‑tramadol/acetaminophen group (n=59). The general data and the related data of puncture localization of patients were recorded. The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was used to assess pain scores in all patients. Then, the systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and pulse oxygen saturation immediately after localization, the incidence of moderate to severe pain, the proportion of rescue analgesia, the incidence of adverse drug reactions, patient satisfaction (very satisfied, satisfied, average, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied), and the differences in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate before and after localization were recorded. Results There was no statistical difference in the general data and the related data of puncture localization of patients (all P>0.05). The primary effect of pregabalin and tramadol/acetaminophen were significant (P<0.05), without obvious interaction between them (P=0.752). Compared with the non‑pregabalin group, the pregabalin group showed decreases in the NRS score, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate immediately after localization, the incidence of moderate to severe pain, and the proportion of rescue analgesia (all P<0.05), as well as increases in pulse oxygen saturation immediately after localization and the number of people who were very satisfied (all P<0.05), without statistical differences in the incidence of adverse drug reactions (P>0.05). Compared with the non‑tramadol/acetaminophen group, the tramadol/acetaminophen group presented decreases in the NRS score, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate immediately after localization, the incidence of moderate to severe pain, and the proportion of rescue analgesia (all P<0.05), as well as increases in pulse oxygen saturation immediately after localization and the number of people who were very satisfied (all P<0.05), without statistical differences in the incidence of adverse drug reactions (P>0.05). Compared with group C, group PC and group AC, group PA showed reduction in the NRS score, the differences in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate before and after localization (all P<0.05). Compared with group C, group PC and group AC presented reduction in the NRS score, the differences in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate before and after localization (all P<0.05); but there was no statistical differences between group PC and group AC (P>0.05). Compared with group C, group PA showed decrease in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate immediately after localization, the incidence of moderate to severe pain and the proportion of rescue analgesia, as well as increase in pulse oxygen saturation immediately after localization and the number of people who were very satisfied (all P<0.05). Compared with group C, the incidence of moderate to severe pain in group AC decreased (P<0.05), with increased the number of people who were very satisfied (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of adverse drug reactions among group C, group PC, group AC and group PA (all P>0.05). Conclusions Pregabalin and tramadol/acetaminophen alone or both can significantly reduce the NRS score after puncture localization of pulmonary nodules. However, the combination of the two drugs has the optimal analgesic effect and significantly reduces hemodynamic fluctuations after localization, with a low incidence of adverse drug reactions.

Key words: Pulmonary nodule; Puncture localization; Acute pain; Pregabalin; Tramadol/acetaminophen