国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2024, Issue (10): 0-0
    
性别对亚麻醉剂量艾司氯胺酮下环泊酚用于 胃肠镜检查半数有效量的影响
孙银银, 杨毅, 邓岩军, 徐府奇, 屠伟峰, 王琛1()
1.苏州高新区人民医院
Effect of gender on the half effective dose of ciprofol under subanesthetic esketamine for gastroenteroscopy
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探索性别对亚麻醉剂量艾司氯胺酮下环泊酚用于胃肠镜检查半数有效量(ED50)的影响。 方法 选择拟行无痛胃肠镜检查的患者77例,年龄18~65岁,分为H组(性别不限,25例)、M组(均为男性,24例)、W组(均为女性,28例)。患者麻醉诱导时先缓慢静脉推注艾司氯胺酮0.2 mg/kg,注射后30 s再静脉推注环泊酚。设定环泊酚初始剂量为0.4 mg/kg,剂量梯度0.05 mg/kg,采用Dixon改良序贯法决定下一例患者环泊酚剂量。使用概率单位Probit回归分析法分析3组患者亚麻醉剂量艾司氯胺酮下环泊酚用于胃肠镜检查的ED50、95%有效量(ED95)及其95%置信区间(CI)。记录患者麻醉诱导前(T0)、给药后(T1)时的平均动脉压(MAP)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、心率及围手术期麻醉相关不良反应。 结果 亚麻醉剂量艾司氯胺酮用于胃肠镜检查时环泊酚的ED50及其95%CI:H组为0.349(0.306~0.387) mg/kg,M组为0.338(0.262~0.388) mg/kg,W组为0.407(0.363~0.451) mg/kg。亚麻醉剂量艾司氯胺酮用于胃肠镜检查时环泊酚的ED95及其95%CI:H组为0.427(0.389~0.655) mg/kg,M组为0.439(0.389~0.903) mg/kg,W组为0.499(0.454~0.780) mg/kg。与W组比较,M组亚麻醉剂量艾司氯胺酮下环泊酚行胃肠镜检查时的ED50、ED95较低(均P<0.05)。与T0比较,3组患者T1时SBP、DBP、MAP、心率下降(均P<0.05)。W组1例患者诉有头晕,休息后缓解,3组患者苏醒期均未发生明显恶心呕吐及精神类问题。 结论 0.2 mg/kg艾司氯胺酮联合环泊酚用于胃肠镜检查时循环稳定,较适用于胃肠镜检查,女性环泊酚ED50较男性增加20.41%、ED95较男性增加13.67%,可为临床用药提供指导。

关键词: 环泊酚; 艾司氯胺酮; 无痛胃肠镜; 半数有效量
Abstract:

Objective To explore the effect of gender on the median effective dose (ED50) of ciprofol under subanesthetic esketamine for gastroenteroscopy. Methods A total of 77 patients aged 18‒65 years old were enrolled and divided into three groups: group H (n=25, no gender restrictions), group M (n=24, all male), and group W (n=28, all female). According to Dixon's modified sequential method, esketamine 0.2 mg/kg was slowly administered to each patient during anesthesia induction, and then ciprofol was administered 30 s after injection. The initial dose of ciprofol was set at 0.4 mg/kg and the dose gradient was 0.05 mg/kg, and the dosage of ciprofol in the next patient was determined by Dixon's modified sequential method. Probit regression analysis was used to analyze the ED50, 95% effective dose (ED95), and 95% confidence interval (CI) of subanesthetic dose of esketamine and ciprofol for gastroenteroscopy in 3 groups. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) before anesthesia induction (T0) and after administration (T1) were recorded and perioperative anesthesia‑related adverse reactions were recorded. Results The ED50 and 95%CI of ciprofol under subanesthetic doses of esketamine for gastroenteroscopy were: group H was 0.349 (0.306~0.387) mg/kg, group M was 0.338 (0.262‒0.388) mg/kg while group W was 0.407 (0.363‒0.451) mg/kg. The ED95 and 95%CI were: group H was 0.427 (0.389‒0.655) mg/kg, group M was 0.439 (0.389‒0.903) mg/kg, and group W was 0.499 (0.454‒0.780) mg/kg. Compared with the group W, the ED50 and ED95 of ciprofol in group M were low (P<0.05). Compared with T0, SBP, DBP, MAP and heart rate in 3 groups decreased at T1 (all P<0.05). One patient in group W complained of dizziness, which was relieved after rest, and no obvious nausea, vomiting, or mental problems occurred in the three groups during the recovery period. Conclusions 0.2 mg/kg esketamine combined with ciprofol was stable in gastroenteroscopy, which was more suitable for gastroenteroscopy. Compared with males the ED50 and ED95 were increased by 20.41% and 13.67%, which could guide clinical use.

Key words: Ciprofol; Esketamine; Painless gastroenteroscopy; Median effective dose