国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2025, Issue (1): 0-0
    
超声引导下颈浅丛神经阻滞对微血管减压术患者术后恢复质量的影响
张楠, 陈思敏, 张煜晟, 张蕾, 张茂银1()
1.徐州医科大学
Effects of ultrasound‑guided superficial cervical plexus block on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing microvascular decompression
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探讨微血管减压术(MVD)患者在超声引导下行颈浅丛神经阻滞(SCPB)后恢复质量情况。 方法 选取拟行MVD的面肌痉挛(HFS)患者60例,按照随机数字表法分为颈浅丛阻滞组和单纯全麻组,每组30例。颈浅丛阻滞组患者行超声引导下术侧SCPB复合全麻,单纯全麻组行单纯全麻;两组全麻方案相同。记录两组基本资料,术后24 h的40项恢复质量量表(QoR‑40)评分,术后1、6、24、48 h静息和运动数字分级评分法(NRS)疼痛评分,术后不同时段[T1(00.05)。与单纯全麻组比较,颈浅丛阻滞组患者术后24 h QoR‑40中情绪状态、身体舒适度、疼痛评分和总分较高(均P<0.05),术中瑞芬太尼用量较少(P<0.05),术后1、6、24 h静息和运动NRS疼痛评分较低(均P<0.05),T1、T2时段补救镇痛率较低(均P<0.05),术后48 h严重疼痛发生率较低(P<0.05)。其他指标两组患者差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。颈浅丛阻滞组患者无神经阻滞相关并发症发生。 结论 与单纯全麻相比,超声引导下SCPB联合全麻可以提高HFS患者MVD术后恢复质量,降低术后疼痛强度和补救镇痛率,减少严重疼痛发生,促进患者加速康复。

关键词: 颈浅丛神经阻滞; 微血管减压术; 术后恢复质量; 加速康复外科
Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effect of ultrasound‑guided superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing microvascular decompression (MVD). Methods A total of 60 patients with hemifacial spasms (HFS) who were scheduled for microvascular decompression were selected. According to the random number table method, they were divided into two groups (n=30): a SCPB group and a general anesthesia group. Patients in the SCPB group underwent ultrasound‑guided SCPB on the surgical side in combination with general anesthesia, while those in the general anesthesia group received general anesthesia alone. Both groups were given the same general anesthesia protocols. Their general information was recorded. The 40‑item Quality of Recovery Score (QoR‑40) was recorded at postoperative 24 h. The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores at rest and during movement were recorded at postoperative 1, 6, 24 h and 48 h. The rate of rescue analgesia was assessed at different time points after surgery: T1 (00.05). Compared with the general anesthesia group, the SCPB group showed increases in QoR‑40 scores for pain, physical comfort, emotional state, and total score at postoperative 24 h (all P<0.05), decreases in the intraoperative doses of remifentanil (P<0.05), decreases in NRS scores at rest and during movement at postoperative 1, 6 h and 24 h (all P<0.05), decreases in the rate of rescue analgesia at T1 and T2 (all P<0.05), and decreases in the incidence of severe pain at postoperative 48 h (P<0.05). There were no statistical differences in other indexes between the two groups (all P>0.05). No nerve block‑related complications occurred in the SCPB group. Conclusions Compared with general anesthesia alone, the combination of ultrasound‑guided SCPB and general anesthesia can improve postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing MVD, relieve postoperative pain, reduce the rates of rescue analgesia, decrease the incidence of severe pain, and promotes enhanced recovery.

Key words: Superficial cervical plexus block; Microvascular decompression; Postoperative quality of recovery; Enhanced recovery surgery