国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2024, Issue (6): 2-2
    
腰硬联合麻醉分娩镇痛复合静脉和硬膜外 布托啡诺安全性及有效性研究
韩学昌, 张亚杰, 张露, 乔传勋, 葛军甫, 邢群智, 蔡玮, 田聪, 马竹青1()
1.河南科技大学第一附属医院
A comparative study on the safety and effectiveness of intravenous and epidural administration of butorphanol during combined spinal‑epidural anesthesia for labor analgesia
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探讨静脉和硬膜外复合给予布托啡诺在腰硬联合麻醉分娩镇痛效果中的有效性和安全性。 方法 选择要求行分娩镇痛的足月自然分娩初产妇297例,按随机数字表法分为3组:无布托啡诺组(Ⅰ组,98例)、布托啡诺硬膜外给药组(Ⅱ组,100例)、布托啡诺静脉+硬膜外联合给药组(Ⅲ组,99例)。3组产妇均行腰硬联合麻醉分娩镇痛:蛛网膜下腔给予舒芬太尼2 μg,硬膜外腔分别给予不同混合液3 ml(试验量)+10 ml(Ⅰ组为罗哌卡因150 mg+舒芬太尼48 μg,Ⅱ组、Ⅲ组为罗哌卡因150 mg+舒芬太尼48 μg+布托啡诺2 mg,均使用生理盐水稀释到200 ml);接着Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组给予生理盐水5 ml,Ⅲ组给予布托啡诺0.5 mg/5 ml入墨菲式滴管静脉滴注;在硬膜外腔以7 ml/h泵入混合液直至胎盘娩出后12 h。宫口开至3 cm分娩镇痛前即刻(T0)、给予硬膜外总量后20 min即刻(T1)、宫口开全即刻(T2)、胎儿娩出即刻(T3)、胎盘娩出即刻(T4)、胎盘娩出后4 h(T5)、胎盘娩出后8 h(T6)分别采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛评分、Ramsay镇静评分和Bromage改良评分对产妇进行疼痛、镇静和下肢运动神经阻滞程度评分,同时记录产妇T1、T2时的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)、呼吸频率;检测T0、T4、T6时产妇静脉血P物质、5‑羟色胺(5‑HT)、亮脑啡肽、β‑内啡肽(β‑EP)含量;记录第一、第二、第三产程时间及使用催产素例数,新生儿1 min、5 min、10 min Apgar评分和脐动脉血气分析[pH、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、乳酸(Lac)];观察记录产妇不良反应(分娩方式改变、呼吸抑制、嗜睡、低血压、恶心、呕吐、寒战、尿潴留、皮肤瘙痒)发生情况。 结果 T2、T3时,Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组VAS疼痛评分低于Ⅰ组,且Ⅲ组低于Ⅱ组(均P<0.05);T1、T2时,Ⅱ组、Ⅲ组Ramsay镇静评分高于Ⅰ组,且Ⅲ组高于Ⅱ组(均P<0.05);与T0时比较,3组产妇T1~T6时VAS疼痛评分降低(均P<0.05),Ramsay镇静评分升高(均P<0.05);3组产妇Bromage改良评分均为0分。T3时,Ⅲ组MAP低于Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组(均P<0.05);与T0时比较,3组产妇T1~T6时MAP、心率、呼吸频率均降低(均P<0.05)。T4时,Ⅱ组P物质含量低于Ⅰ组,Ⅱ组、Ⅲ组亮脑啡肽、β‑EP含量高于Ⅰ组(均P<0.05);与T0时比较,3组产妇T4、T6时P物质、5‑HT含量降低,亮脑啡肽、β‑EP含量升高(均P<0.05);与T4时比较,3组产妇T6时P物质、亮脑啡肽、β‑EP含量降低(均P<0.05)。其余时点各指标差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。3组产妇第一、第二、第三产程时间,使用催产素例数,新生儿1 min、5 min、10 min Apgar评分和脐动脉血气分析(pH、PaCO2、PaO2、Lac)差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。3组产妇分娩期间未发生分娩方式改变、呼吸抑制、嗜睡、低血压、寒战、尿潴留等不良反应;Ⅲ组恶心、呕吐、皮肤瘙痒发生率低于Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组(均P<0.05),Ⅱ组恶心、呕吐、皮肤瘙痒发生率低于Ⅰ组(均P<0.05)。 结论 腰硬联合麻醉分娩镇痛中静脉和硬膜外复合给予布托啡诺能最大程度地减轻器质性疼痛及心理应激反应,提高产妇自然分娩时的舒适度,取得良好的分娩镇痛临床效果。

关键词: 静脉麻醉; 硬膜外麻醉; 腰硬联合麻醉; 分娩镇痛
Abstract:

Objective To explore the clinical effect and safety of intravenous and epidural administration of butorphanol in the analgesic effect of combined spinal‑epidural anesthesia for labor anesthesia. Methods A total of 297 primiparous women in full‑term spontaneous delivery who requested labor analgesia were selected. According to the random number table method, they were divided into three groups: a non‑butorphanol group (group Ⅰ, n=98), a butorphanol epidural administration group (group Ⅱ,n=100), and a butorphanol combined intravenous and epidural administration group (group Ⅲ, n=99). All three groups of parturients underwent combined spinal‑epidural anesthesia for labor analgesia: 2 μg of sufentanil was administered in the subarachnoid, and 3 ml (the test volume) + 10 ml of different mixed solutions were given in the epidural space (group Ⅰ: ropivacaine 150 mg+sufentanil 48 μg; group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ: ropivacaine 150 mg+sufentanil 48 μg+butorphanol 2 mg; and all the above solutions were diluted to 200 ml with normal saline). Next, 5 ml of normal saline were given to group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ, while group Ⅲ was intravenously given 0.5 mg/5 ml of butorphanol via a Murphy style dropper. The mixture was pumped into the epidural space at 7 ml/h until 12 h after delivery of the placenta. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, Ramsay Sedation score and Bromage Modified score were used to evaluate the degree of pain, sedation and motor nerve block in the lower limbs, immediately before the opening of the uterus to 3 cm for labor analgesia (T0), 20 min immediately after the administration of total epidural volume (T1), immediately after the opening of the uterus (T2), immediately after the delivery of the fetus (T3), immediately after the delivery of the placenta (T4), 4 h after the delivery of the placenta (T5), and 8 h after the delivery of the placenta (T6). Meanwhile, the mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) and respiratory rate were recorded. The levels of substance P, 5‑hydroxytryptamine (5‑HT), leu‑enkephalin and β‑endorphin (β‑EP) in venous blood were detected at T0, T4 and T6. The duration of the first, second, and third stages of labor, and the number of cases of oxytocin use were recorded. The neonate 1 min, 5 min, 10 min Apgar scores and umbilical artery blood gas analysis [pH, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), and lactic acid (Lac)] were recorded. The maternal adverse reactions were observed and recorded, including changes in the mode of delivery, respiratory depression, lethargy, hypotension, nausea, vomiting, chills, urinary retention, and itchy skin. Results At T2 and T3, groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ showed lower VAS scores than group Ⅰ, where decreased VAS scores were found in group Ⅲ, compared with group Ⅱ (all P<0.05). At T1 and T2, Ramsay Sedation scores in groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ were significantly higher than that in group Ⅰ, where Ramsay sedation score in group Ⅲ was higher than that in group Ⅱ (all P<0.05). Compared with those at T0, VAS scores in the three groups decreased at T1‒T6 (all P<0.05), while Ramsay Sedation scores increased (all P<0.05); and the Bromage Modified score in the three groups was 0. At T3, group Ⅲ showed lower MAP than groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ (all P<0.05). Compared with those at T0, the three groups presented remarkable decreases in MAP, heart rate and respiratory rate at T1‒T6 (all P<0.05). At T4, group Ⅱ showed less amounts of substance P than group Ⅰ, while leu‑enkephalin and β‑EP contents in groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ were significantly higher than those in group Ⅰ (all P<0.05). Compared with those at T0, the contents of substance P and 5‑HT in the three groups significantly decreased at T4 and T6, while the contents of leu‑enkephalin and β‑EP significantly increased (all P<0.05). Compared with those at T4, the amounts of substance P, leu‑enkephalin and β‑EP in the three groups significantly decreased at T6 (all P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in other indicators at other time points (all P>0.05). There were no statistical differences in the first, second and third stages of labor, the number of cases of oxytocin use, the neonate 1 min, 5 min, 10 min Apgar scores and umbilical artery blood gas analysis (pH, PaCO2, PaO2 and Lac) among the three groups (all P>0.05). No adverse reactions such as changes in the mode of delivery, respiratory depression, lethargy, hypotension, chills, and urinary retention occurred in the three groups during delivery. Group Ⅲ showed lower incidences of nausea, vomiting and itchy skin than groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ (all P<0.05), while decreases in the incidences of nausea, vomiting and itchy skin were seen in group Ⅱ, compared with group Ⅰ (all P<0.05). Conclusions Intravenous and epidural administration of butorphanol during combined spinal‑epidural anesthesia for labor anesthesia can minimize organic pain and psychological stress, improve maternal comfort during natural childbirth, and achieve good clinical results in labor analgesia.

Key words: Intravenous anesthesia; Epidural anesthesia; Combined spinal‑epidural anesthesia; Labor analgesia