国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2024, Issue (7): 9-9
    
浓度递增法程控硬膜外间歇脉冲注入罗哌卡因在妊娠期高血压产妇分娩中的应用
黄阳, 叶斌, 黄涛1()
1.扬州大学医学院附属医院扬州市妇幼保健院
Application of dose‑escalation method for programmed intermittent epidural bolus of ropivacaine in delivery of pregnant women with gestational hypertension
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探讨浓度递增法程控硬膜外间歇脉冲注入罗哌卡因在妊娠期高血压产妇分娩中的应用价值。 方法 选取妊娠期高血压疾病(HDCP)待产产妇136例,按随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组(每组68例)。两组均行硬膜外穿刺置管,分娩过程中对照组采用固定浓度法给药,观察组根据产程进展采用浓度递增法给药。记录产妇一般资料,镇痛起效时间,镇痛显效时间,镇痛时间,产程时间(第一产程、第二产程、第三产程),镇痛前、镇痛后5 min、镇痛后10 min及各产程收缩压和舒张压;检测麻醉前(T0)、分娩时(T1)、胎儿出生时(T2)、胎盘娩出5 min(T3)、胎盘娩出1 h(T4)、胎盘娩出6 h(T5)时血浆皮质醇浓度和肾上腺素浓度;评估镇痛前(t0)、镇痛后10 min(t1)、镇痛后30 min(t2)、镇痛后1 h(t3)、镇痛后2 h(t4)、宫口开全时(t5)、分娩时(t6)的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛评分;记录产妇分娩结束后24 h镇痛满意度和不良反应发生情况。采用广义估计方程(GEE)法评估固定浓度法和浓度递增法对总产程时间、收缩压和舒张压的影响。 结果 与对照组比较,观察组产妇在镇痛后5 min、镇痛后10 min收缩压和舒张压较低(均P<0.05),第二产程、第三产程及镇痛显效时间较短,镇痛时间较长(均P<0.05);两组一般资料,镇痛前、第一产程、第二产程和第三产程的收缩压和舒张压,第一产程和镇痛起效时间等差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。T1~T5时对照组血浆皮质醇浓度和肾上腺素浓度高于观察组(均P<0.05);与T0时比较,T1~T5时对照组血浆皮质醇浓度和肾上腺素浓度升高(均P<0.05),T2时观察组肾上腺素浓度升高(P<0.05)。t4~t6时对照组产妇VAS疼痛评分明显高于观察组(均P<0.05);与t0时比较,t1~t6时两组产妇VAS疼痛评分明显降低(均P<0.05)。多因素校正后结果显示,对照组与总产程时间、舒张压及收缩压的交互作用有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组与总产程时间的交互作用有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组产妇镇痛满意度低于观察组(P<0.05),总不良反应发生率高于观察组(P<0.05)。 结论 浓度递增法程控硬膜外间歇脉冲注入罗哌卡因对HDCP产妇围手术期镇痛效果明显,有利于维持产妇围手术期血压稳定,降低不良反应发生率。

关键词: 妊娠期高血压疾病; 硬膜外分娩镇痛; 脉冲注入; 浓度递增法; 罗哌卡因
Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the application of dose‑escalation method for programmed intermittent epidural bolus of ropivacaine in delivery of pregnant women with gestational hypertension. Methods A total of 136 women with hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy (HDCP) in labor were selected as subjects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into two groups: a control group and an observation group (n=68). Both groups underwent epidural puncture and catheterization. The control group was administered with a fixed concentration of anesthetic agents during labor (the fixed dose method), while in the observation group, the dose of anesthetic agents gradually increased according to the progress of labor (the dose‑escalation method). Both groups were compared for general information, time to analgesia onset, analgesic effective time, duration of analgesia, duration of labor (the first stage of labor, the second stage of labor, and the third stage of labor), changes in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure before analgesia, 5 min after analgesia, and 10 min after analgesia. Plasma cortisol and epinephrine concentrations were measured before anesthesia (T0), at the time of delivery (T1), at the time of fetal birth (T2), 5 min after delivery of the placenta (T3), 1 h after delivery of the placenta (T4), and 6 h after delivery of the placenta (T5). Their Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were compared before anesthesia (t0), 10 min after anesthesia (t1), 30 min after anesthesia (t2), 1 h after anesthesia (t3), 2 h after anesthesia (t4), at the opening of the uterine orifice (t5), and at delivery (t6). The satisfaction with analgesia and the incidences of adverse reactions 24 h after labor were recorded in both groups. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) method was used to assess the effect of fixed‑dose and dose‑escalation‑ methods on the total duration of labor and blood pressure. Results Compared with the control group, the observation group showed significant decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressures 5 min after analgesia and 10 min after analgesia (all P<0.05), the observation group presented significantly shortened maternal second stage of labor, third stage of labor and analgesic effective time, and significantly prolonged analgesic time (all P<0.05). There was no difference in general information, systolic and diastolic blood pressures before analgesia, during the first stage of labor, the second stage of labor and the third stage of labor, the first stage of labor and the time to analgesia onset between the two groups (all P>0.05). The control group presented higher plasma cortisol and epinephrine concentrations at T1 to T5 than the observation group (all P<0.05). The control group showed significantly higher plasma cortisol and epinephrine concentrations at T1 to T5 than those at T0 (all P<0.05), while the concentration of epinephrine at T2 in the observation group was significantly higher than those at T0 (P<0.05). Both groups showed lower VAS scores at t1 to t6 than those at t0 (all P<0.05), whereas the VAS scores in the control group significantly increased at t4 to t6, compared with the observation group (all P<0.05). The multifactorial corrected results showed that the interaction among the control group and total duration of labor, diastolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure was statistically significant (P<0.05), and that the interaction between the observation group and total duration of labor was statistically significant (P<0.05). The control group presented significantly lower analgesic satisfaction than the observation group (P<0.05). The total incidence of adverse reactions was significantly higher in the control group than that in the observation group (P<0.05). Conclusions The dose‑escalation method for programmed intermittent epidural pulse of ropivacaine is effective in perioperative analgesia for pregnant women with gestational hypertension, which facilitates to stabilize perioperative blood pressure and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.

Key words: Hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy; Epidural labor analgesia; Pulsed ion implantation; The dose‑escalation method; Ropivacaine; Sufentanil