国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2024, Issue (8): 0-0
    
无阿片药麻醉对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后恶心呕吐的影响
任心仪, 张书芮, 朱雨薇, 张静, 李紫娴, 齐敦益1()
1.徐州医科大学附属医院
Effect of balanced opioid‑free anesthesia on postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探讨无阿片药麻醉(OFA)对腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)后患者恶心呕吐及恢复质量的影响。 方法 采用随机数字表法将99例拟择期行LC的患者分为两组:对照组(OA组,50例)和OFA组(49例)。OA组以舒芬太尼等药物诱导麻醉,瑞芬太尼复合七氟醚维持麻醉;OFA组使用艾司氯胺酮等诱导并以艾司氯胺酮复合七氟醚维持麻醉。观察两组患者术后24 h内恶心、呕吐[术后恶心呕吐(post operative nausea and vomiting, PONV)]及其他不良反应发生率,术前及术后24 h、48 h、7 d 40项恢复质量量表(QoR‑40)评分,术中各时点[入室时(T1)、插管后1 min(T2)、手术开始时(T3)、牵拉胆囊时(T4)、手术结束时(T5)]血流动力学[平均动脉压(MAP)、心率]情况,麻醉及术中资料情况等。 结果 与OA组比较:OFA 组术后24 h内PONV、呕吐、腹胀发生率,术中去氧肾上腺素使用量,T3~T5时心率,T2~T5时MAP较低(均P<0.05);麻醉后监测治疗室(PACU)停留时间较少(P<0.05);术后24 h身体舒适度、身体自理及疼痛评分,术后48 h QoR‑40评分及其情绪状态、身体舒适度评分较高(均P<0.05)。与术前比较:两组患者术后24、48 h QoR‑40评分及其身体舒适度、疼痛评分降低(均P<0.05);术后24 h情绪状态、身体自理评分降低(均P<0.05);术后7 d QoR‑40评分及其情绪状态、疼痛评分升高(均P<0.05)。其余指标差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。 结论 OFA可以减少LC术后24 h内PONV及呕吐、腹胀发生率,提供更好的血流动力学稳定性;对患者术后恢复质量的提高具有统计学意义,但不具有临床意义。

关键词: 无阿片药麻醉; 艾司氯胺酮; 术后恶心呕吐; 术后恢复质量; 腹腔镜胆囊
Abstract:

Objective To explore the effect of opioid‑free anesthesia (OFA) on nausea and vomiting and recovery quality of patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods According to the random number table method, 99 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into two groups: an control group (OA group) (n=50) and an OFA group (n=49). In the OA group, anesthesia was inducted with sufentanil and other drugs and maintained with remifentanil combined with sevoflurane. In contrast, esketamine was used for anesthesia induction in the OFA group, followed by anesthesia maintenance with esketamine combined with sevoflurane. Then, the incidence of nausea and vomiting [postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)] and other adverse reactions within 24 h after operation, the 40‑items Quality of Recovery Scale (QoR‑40) scores before surgery and at postoperative 24 h, 48 h and 7 d were recorded; the hemodynamics [mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate] at each point of the operation [at admission (T1), 1 min after intubation (T2), at the beginning of the operation (T3), at the time of pulling the gallbladder (T4), and at the end of the operation (T5)] were recorded, anesthesia and intraoperative data were recorded in the two groups. Results Compared with the OA group, the OFA group showed decreases in the incidences of PONV, vomiting, abdominal distension and intraoperative phenylephrine consumption within postoperative 24 h, heart rate at T3‒T5, and MAP at T2‒T5 (all P<0.05); reduction in the length of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay (P<0.05); and increases in physical comfort, physical self‑care, and pain scores within postoperative 24 h, and QoR‑40 scores, their emotional state and physical comfort scores at postoperative 48 h (all P<0.05). Compared with those before surgery, patients in both groups presented decreases in QoR‑40 scores, physical comfort and pain scores at postoperative 24 h and 48 h (all P<0.05); decreases in emotional state and physical self‑care scores at postoperative 24 h (all P<0.05); and increases in QoR‑40 scores, emotional state and pain scores at postoperative 7 day (all P<0.05). The differences in the remaining indicators were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Conclusions OFA can reduce the incidence of PONV, vomiting and abdominal distension within 24 h after LC, and provide better hemodynamic stability. It is statistically but not clinically significant in improving the quality of patients' postoperative recovery.

Key words: Opioid‑free anaesthesia; Esketamine; Postoperative nausea and vomiting; Postoperative recovery quality; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy