国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2012, Issue (8): 0-0
    
普瑞巴林对下腹部手术患者术后镇痛的影响
许培阳, 岳云, 时蓉, 吴志云, 王云1()
1.福建省泉州市解放军第180医院麻醉科
Effects of pregabalin on the postoperative analgesia in patients with lower abdominal surgery
 全文:
摘要:

[[摘要] 目的 评价普瑞巴林对下腹部手术病人术后镇痛的影响。方法 采用完全随机分组、安慰剂对照研究方法,择期行下腹部手术患者30例,年龄19岁~60岁,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,随机分为两组(每组15例);普瑞巴林组(P组)和对照组(C组)。患者麻醉前30 min,P组口服普瑞巴林胶囊75 mg,C组口服自制面粉胶囊。两组患者常规麻醉诱导,术中静脉泵注瑞芬太尼和异丙酚,按需追加肌松药维持麻醉。两组患者术后均采用患者静脉自控镇痛(patient-controlled intravenous analgesia, PCIA),并于术后2、4、8、12、20、24 h等时点,采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评价患者静息痛和咳嗽痛的程度。记录术后2、4、8、12、20、24 h等时点PCIA有效次数和总次数,及术后镇痛药液累计耗量;记录术后不良反应的发生情况。结果 30例患者均完成试验。与术后2 h时比较,两组术后4、8、12、20、24 h PCIA有效次数和总次数差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);与C组比较, P组术后各时点静息痛VAS评分[(5.3±0.5)、(4.5±0.6)、(3.7±0.6)、(2.5±0.8)、(1.4±0.5)、(0.8±0.4)]和咳嗽痛VAS评分[(7.3±0.6)、(6.5±0.7)、(5.5±0.5)、(4.6±0.8)、(3.3±0.5)、(2.9±0.4)]均低于C组[(6.3±0.7)、(5.8±0.6)、(4.9±0.5)、(4.3±0.6)、(2.5±0.7)、(1.9±0.3)]和[(8.1±0.5)、(7.7±0.5)、(7.0±0.4)、(6.3±0.6)、(4.5±0.6)、(3.9±0.5)](P <0.05),术后各时点PCIA有效次数[(2.0±0.4)、(3.3±0.7)、(3.9±1.1)、(3.9±1.1)、(3.9±1.1)、(3.9±1.1)]和总次数[(2.5±0.7)、(3.9±1.0)、(4.5±1.4)、(4.5±1.4)、(4.5±1.4)、(4.5±1.4)]降低,镇痛药液耗量显著减少(P <0.05)。两组患者术后副作用仅表现为恶心和呕吐,且两组间差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论 麻醉前口服普瑞巴林75 mg可提高患者术后静脉镇痛效果,减少镇痛药用量,且副作用少,有利于患者的术后恢复。

关键词: 普瑞巴林;镇痛;患者自控
Abstract:

[Abstract] Objective To investigate the effects of pregabalin on the postoperative analgesia in patients with lower abdominal surgery. Methods: The patients aged 19-70, ASA I-II, scheduled for lower abdominal surgery were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=15): Group P (pregabalin) and Group C(control). The patients in Group P and C orally took pregabalin (75 mg) or self-made flour capsule 30 min prior to general anesthesia, respectively. General anesthesia was routinely induced and maintained with remifentanil, propofol and muscle relaxant. The patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA) was used in every patient. The rest pain and cough pain was assessed using vision analogue scale (VAS)at 2, 4, 8, 12, 20 and 24 h after surgery,respectively. The effective and total numbers of PCIA, analgesic comsuption and side-effects were recorded in postoperative 24h. Results All 30 patients completed the trial. Compared with postoperative 2h postoperative 4,8,12,20,24 h, the the PCIA effective frequency and the total number of difference was statistically significant ( P <0.05 ) . Compared with group C [(6.3±0.7)、(5.8±0.6)、(4.9±0.5)、(4.3±0.6)、(2.5±0.7)、(1.9±0.3)]and[(8.1±0.5)、(7.7±0.5)、(7.0±0.4)、(6.3±0.6)、(4.5±0.6)、(3.9±0.5)], VAS during rest[(5.3±0.5)、(4.5±0.6)、(3.7±0.6)、(2.5±0.8)、(1.4±0.5)、(0.8±0.4)]and cough[(7.3±0.6)、(6.5±0.7)、(5.5±0.5)、(4.6±0.8)、(3.3±0.5)、(2.9±0.4)] at each time point static rest pain and cough, pain VAS scores were lower than group C ( P <0.05 ) lower after point postoperation were lower( P <0.05).Postoperative effective frequency[(2.0±0.4)、(3.3±0.7)、(3.9±1.1)、(3.9±1.1)、(3.9±1.1)、(3.9±1.1)]and the total number[(2.5±0.7)、(3.9±1.0)、(4.5±1.4)、(4.5±1.4)、(4.5±1.4)、(4.5±1.4)]of PCIA were lower in group P than that in group C( P > 0.05 ). Only nausea and vomiting were observed as post operation side effects, and there was no significant difference between the two groups ( P > 0.05 ) . Conclusions Orally-taken pregabalin (75 mg) prior to anesthesia may improve the treatment of postoperative analgesia, reduce the consumption of analgestics with less side-effects and contribute to the patients’recovery.

Key words: Pregabalin; Analgesia; Patient-control